Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with terminology
Search options not deleted
user 9043
For questions about the definition or meaning of terms used within Operations Research. Do not use this tag for questions about notation.
1
vote
Is there a concept of shrinking the consideration set?
You do need to be careful of applying this "we can disregard" idea more than once.
Suppose S contains two subsets, T and U. By some argument, typically symmetry,
you might be able to argue that
a) if …
- 509