Timeline for Can we simplify (perhaps linearize) this constraint?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 6:36 | history | edited | user9659 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 20 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2021 at 5:59 | comment | added | user9659 | Thank you. I'm looking it up now. The complete constraint that we modeled is $\mathbb{E}[Y_j]=(y_j z_j)/(1-z_j)$ for all $j$ and $z_j>0$, and we have $y_j$ as mentioned in the question. That is why I was trying to linearize the $RHS$ of $y_j$ by itself. | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:33 | comment | added | RobPratt | I was thinking that you might be able to apply compact linearization a la Liberti. Where else does $y_j$ appear in the model? | |
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:29 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:04 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 18, 2021 at 4:03 | comment | added | user9659 | We have $\sum_j \sum_k x_{ij}^k=1$ for all $i$. Could you please let me know why this important? Is there another way to simplify the ratio? | |
| Dec 17, 2021 at 22:35 | comment | added | RobPratt | Do you also have constraints like $\sum_i x_{ij}^k=1$ or maybe $\sum_k x_{ij}^k=1$? | |
| Dec 17, 2021 at 22:33 | history | edited | RobPratt |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 17, 2021 at 20:52 | answer | added | prubin♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| S Dec 17, 2021 at 20:29 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 17, 2021 at 21:10 | |||||
| S Dec 17, 2021 at 20:29 | history | asked | user9659 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |