Timeline for How to model a non-overlap constraint between 2 groups of tasks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 at 21:39 | comment | added | RobPratt | In that case, I suspect that the generalization of @worldsmithhelper's model to multiple pairs of groups (instead of just one pair $(1,2)$) would do better. | |
| Oct 15, 2021 at 21:29 | comment | added | LouisPopovic | Durations are integer, they are given ($d_t$) while start time are variables. | |
| Oct 15, 2021 at 20:57 | comment | added | RobPratt | Yes, the cardinalities could change which model performs best. Are your durations and start times integer or arbitrary? | |
| Oct 15, 2021 at 20:05 | comment | added | LouisPopovic | Would this still be a good approach if there was around 30 pairs of sets of 10 tasks each ? Does the cardinality of the sets and the number of pairs of sets could change the choice of which modelisation to use for this constraint ? Thanks! | |
| Oct 14, 2021 at 21:49 | history | answered | RobPratt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |