Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

What is MCDA?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family as well as SMAA methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family as well as SMAA methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

What is MCDA?

Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family as well as SMAA methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

Notice removed Draw attention by Rob
Bounty Ended with Oguz Toragay's answer chosen by Rob
added 16 characters in body
Source Link
JKHA
  • 841
  • 5
  • 11

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family as well as SMAA methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family as well as SMAA methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

Notice added Draw attention by Rob
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Rob
deleted 5 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Marcus Ritt
  • 2.8k
  • 14
  • 35

Families of methods to deal with criterion uncertainties in multicrteriamulticriteria decision analysis

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And let suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? DoesIs the environmental impact of each project is more important thatthan the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

Families of methods to deal with criterion uncertainties in multicrteria decision analysis

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And let suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Does environmental impact of each project is more important that the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

Families of methods to deal with criterion uncertainties in multicriteria decision analysis

##In MCDA, which family methods deal with uncertain criterion-specific values?

###What is MCDA? Multiple-criteria decision analysis, refereed as MCDA, is a sub-field of Operations Research for aiding in decision making when several objectives have to be considered.

Suppose you have $m\in \mathbb N^*$ alternatives which can be projects, candidates, drugs and so on, depending on your decision problem. And suppose you have $n\in\mathbb N^*$ criteria which asset the $m$ alternatives.

A simple instance of this is:

  • You have $m=100$ projects
  • You have $n=3$ criteria which are:
    1. Cost of each project
    2. Environmental impact of each project
    3. Probability of success of each project

###An example of uncertainty

Then you have a dataset of $m$ rows and $n$ columns. When considering this dataset, you could ask yourself which criteria are most important and which aren't? Is the environmental impact of each project more important than the cost of each project? This question defines the criteria's weights. Many MCDA techniques have already been developed for weights infering (e.g. ELECTRE family) or dealing with incomplete weight information (e.g. SMAA family or RPM family).

###Criterion-specific values uncertainty

Another question about this dataset is what if the evaluations of the alternatives' criterion-specific values are uncertain? (e.g. we only know that the cost of one project is within $[3,6]$M€ for interval uncertainty, but it can be fuzzy intervals, distribution laws, missing values and so on). As far as I know, RPM family methods deal with this kind of uncertainties, and my question is, are there other MCDA family methods dealing with such uncertainties?

Corrected typo in title
Link
Mark L. Stone
  • 13.9k
  • 1
  • 34
  • 70
Loading
added 91 characters in body
Source Link
JKHA
  • 841
  • 5
  • 11
Loading
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
JKHA
  • 841
  • 5
  • 11
Loading
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
JKHA
  • 841
  • 5
  • 11
Loading
Source Link
JKHA
  • 841
  • 5
  • 11
Loading