Timeline for Optimal way to ensure optional intervals are consecutive in OR-Tools
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2020 at 9:36 | answer | added | crypto_rsa | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 10, 2020 at 9:26 | comment | added | crypto_rsa | Thanks for your comments. I'll summarize it in an answer below. | |
| Mar 9, 2020 at 6:33 | comment | added | Laurent Perron | with the negations of the task being active as literal. | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 23:49 | comment | added | Stradivari | You have to create a (i, i) loop. | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 22:08 | comment | added | crypto_rsa | OK, I now understand that using the circuit constraint I can control the order of the events. But what happens with events which are not selected for the given block, i.e. the control variable of their optional interval is false? How can I "exclude" them from the circuit? | |
| Mar 6, 2020 at 23:00 | comment | added | Laurent Perron | Look at the github.com/google/or-tools/blob/…, to force contiguity, replace the >= by ==. Please note that this makes the problem much harder, and most likely infeasible if intervals have different durations. | |
| Mar 6, 2020 at 14:43 | history | edited | EhsanK♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 6, 2020 at 14:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 6, 2020 at 14:43 | |||||
| Mar 6, 2020 at 14:20 | history | asked | crypto_rsa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |